A closer look at the science and the people behind a diagnosis, told plain and simple. This archive is being built; for now, read and subscribe on LinkedIn.
Words like atypical, suspicious, insufficient, unsatisfactory and non-diagnostic sit between negative and positive in a pathology report. This edition explains what they usually mean, what they do not mean, and the questions worth asking your treating doctor.
Read edition 6 on LinkedIn →Laboratory work runs in three phases - before the test, during the test, and after the test. This edition follows how the right question becomes a reliable result, and how a result becomes information that guides care.
Read edition 5 on LinkedIn →A diagnosis is an answer someone is waiting for. This edition looks at the pathologist and the laboratory team behind that answer - and what AI should help them do for patients.
Read edition 4 on LinkedIn →A personalized mRNA vaccine (intismeran autogene), tested with Keytruda after melanoma surgery. What the 5-year data shows - and what it doesn't.
Read edition 3 on LinkedIn →The CTX310 story: editing cholesterol genes inside the body, and the long road from one cut to a real treatment.
Read edition 2 on LinkedIn →After a blood donation, your contribution keeps moving. This first edition follows what can happen to red cells, platelets and plasma, and the people who rely on them.
Find edition 1 on LinkedIn →